Where Scalia Agrees with America
As our recent poll shows, 92% of Americans agree that Congress needs to take action to right the wrongs of the Citizens United decision. One way to start would be to pass a bill like the DISCLOSE Act to force big corporations to publicly reveal the money they spend to influence elections. Proponents of such legislation may worry that the corporate-leaning Supreme Court will overturn the bill after it’s passed – but they shouldn’t worry too much. With the exception of Justice Thomas, none of the Supreme Court Justices have expressed hostility to disclosure requirements - in fact, the most well known conservative Justice on the Court may even be an advocate. As SCOTUSblog pointed out in May, Justice Scalia has been a vocal supporter of transparency in democracy:
Justice Scalia [has] expressed the strong view that disclosure requirements do not implicate significant First Amendment concerns. To the concern that disclosure could deter expression, Justice Scalia responded, “[T]he fact is that running a democracy takes a certain amount of civic courage.”
This may be one of the only instances in which Justice Scalia is in line with the majority of Americans. As our recent poll shows, 89% of Americans support the transparency legislation like the DISCLOSE Act, although many (62%) believe such legislation wouldn’t go far enough to correct the outrageous Citizens United decision.
The American people are right again: just forcing corporations to disclose their political activities can’t fix Citizens United’s dangerous assertion that the 1st amendment guarantees unlimited corporate spending on elections, and conservative Justices – Scalia included – are likely to overturn any legislation that would. That’s why 77% of Americans believe that we need a constitutional amendment to insure that our democratic system isn’t drowned in corporate money. And 74 % say they would be more likely to vote for a candidate for Congress who pledged to support a Constitutional Amendment limiting corporate spending on elections.
UPDATE: The Supreme Court has weighed in more on the value of political disclosure in today's decision in Doe v. Reed. We'll post more on that later this morning.

STAY INFORMED
Get the latest progressive news and updates on how you can get involved!
WHAT WE'RE READING
ACS Blog
AmericaBlog
Buzzflash
Crooks and Liars
Daily Kos
Dispatches from the Culture Wars
DownWithTyranny!
Feministe
Feministing
Firedoglake
Glenn Greenwald
Hullabaloo
Huffington Post
Jack & Jill Politics
Latino Politics Blog
MoJoBlog
Open Left
Page One Q
Pam's House Blend
Pandagon
Raw Story
Political Animal
Right Wing Watch
Street Prophets
Talk To Action
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TAPPED
Text and History
Think Progress
Young People For
Recent Posts
- Beck and Palin’s 9-11 Gravy Train
- Sign the Pledge: Stand for Religious Freedom and Against Intolerance
- Today’s GOP “More Extreme” than Bush?
- Focus on the Family Brings Sex-Ed Fight to China
- Corporate Groups take aim at Hodes in New Hampshire
- More GOP Islamophobia... and its ugly consequences
- Tom Toles is Right On
- The Tea Party and the Religious Right at "Restoring Honor"
- Newsweek Poll: Republicans Think Obama 'Probably' Wants To Impose Islamic Law
- FL-22: House Candidate Allen West Speaks the Tea Party's Language








Facebook
Change.org
MySpace
YouTube