Indefinite Detention: Wrong Under Bush, Wrong Under Obama
For some people in Guantanamo Bay who are found not guilty in a court of law for whatever they are eventually put on trial for, the Obama Administration is floating the idea of keeping them in "indefinite detention" anyway. According to the Washington Post:
Guantanamo Bay detainees who are acquitted by civil or military courts may still be imprisoned indefinitely if the government determines that they pose a national security threat, the Defense Department's chief lawyer said yesterday. "The question of what happens if there's an acquittal is an interesting question -- we talk about that often within the administration," Pentagon general counsel Jeh Johnson said at a Senate hearing. "If, for some reason, he's not convicted for a lengthy prison sentence, then, as a matter of legal authority, I think it's our view that we would have the ability to detain that person," he said.
Reading this sends a chill down my spine. We are a country governed by law, and we cherish our liberty. The United States Constitution establishes a number of safeguards to limit the government's ability to use its awesome power to simply lock people away. That's why we have trials. That's why we have juries. That's why we prevent the police from beating confessions out of people. That's why we give defendants the right to cross-examine those testifying against them. And when the government loses at trial and a person is found not guilty, our liberty is further protected by the Constitution's prohibition of double jeopardy.
Our nation's founders knew that the system wouldn't be perfect, but they recognized that protecting the rights of all people - even bad people - is what liberty is all about.
An LA Times editorial put it simply two years ago, when President Bush proposed the same idea as the one currently being discussed: "[A]n acquittal must mean more than a return trip to a prison cell."
Just because it would be Barack Obama and not George Bush holding the prison door key does not make this any less of a threat to America's constitutional principles.

STAY INFORMED
Get the latest progressive news and updates on how you can get involved!
WHAT WE'RE READING
ACS Blog
AmericaBlog
Buzzflash
Crooks and Liars
Daily Kos
Dispatches from the Culture Wars
DownWithTyranny!
Feministe
Feministing
Firedoglake
Glenn Greenwald
Hullabaloo
Huffington Post
Jack & Jill Politics
Latino Politics Blog
MoJoBlog
Open Left
Page One Q
Pam's House Blend
Pandagon
Raw Story
Political Animal
Right Wing Watch
Street Prophets
Talk To Action
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TAPPED
Text and History
Think Progress
Young People For
Recent Posts
- Not the End of DOMA (Reprise)
- New York Court Rules Some Same-Sex Couples Entitled to Benefits
- Reid Announces Senate Health Care Bill Without Stupak Amendment
- DC Marriage Equality and Religious Liberty
- Washington Post Publishes One-Sided Feature Story on Bishop Harry Jackson
- D.C. Strikes Down Anti-Marriage Equality Initiative
- Despite Anti-Choice Health Care Attacks, RNC Covered Abortion Services Since 1991
- Is the End of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell on the Horizon?
- 10 Year Old Stands Up for Equality
- Quite the 360: The Mormon Church is backing gay rights bill in Salt Lake City








Facebook
Change.org
MySpace
YouTube